The Reality
Friday, January 11, 2008
  Tax Cuts Don't Pay for Themselves
Republicans love to say tax cuts pay for themselves. It's an easy sell - it promises something for nothing. If we cut taxes people will start working harder to keep more of their money. This effort will grow the economy fast enough to increase the overall tax base, which in turn will actually increase taxes. The problem is this has never worked.

All of this information comes from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

Tax revenues from individual taxpayers were $290 billion in 1981 and $451 billion in 1989 for an increase of 55%. Over the same period, the GDP price deflator increased from 59.128 to 78.569, or an increase of 32.87%. This makes the increase in tax revenues from individuals for Reagan's presidency 22.13%.

Tax revenues from individual taxpayers were $505 billion in 1993 and $904 billion in 2001 for an increase of 79%%. Over the same period, the GDP price deflator increased from 88.39 to 102.42 or an increase of 15%. This makes the increase in tax revenues from individuals for Clinton's presidency 64%.

Tax revenues from individual taxpayers were $994 billion in 2001 and $924 billion in 2005 for a decrease of 7%. Over the same period, the GDP price deflator increased from 102.42 to 112.744 or an increase of 10%. This makes the increase in tax revenues from individuals for Bush a decrease of 17%.

So, we get the following inflation adjusted increases in individual tax revenue for each of the last three presidents:

Reagan: 22.13%
Clinton: 64%
Bush: -17%


Here is a chart of the year over year percentage change in federal tax receipts:
Economist Hale Stewart described this Government chart:

"Kennedy cut taxes in the early 1960s. What happened? There was a spike in revenue in the late 1960s. Maybe that means the Laffer curve is correct?

Reagan cut taxes in the 1980s. But there was no spike in revenue. Maybe tax cuts don't pay for themselves. But, let's try that experiment again.

Bush cut taxes twice (not once) in the early 2000s. Notice that after the first tax cut revenues dropped. But then tax revenues spiked -- so they must work! Actually, no. Remember this is a year over year chart. That means the spikes in the later 2000s are being compared to the dropping revenue is the early 2000s. In other words -- the tax cuts didn't pay for themselves (again).

The chart is very clear. Kennedy's cuts worked. Reagan's didn't. Bush II's didn't

Can we stop this crap now?"

Yes. I hope so.

 
Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home
When my posts on other blogs are too long, I'll dump stuff here.

Maybe to be included in the liberal blogsphere's omnibus "I Tried to Stop This: What the reality-based community knew during the sanity interregnum."

MY OTHER BLOGS

MyMySpace
MyAdvomaticBlog
MyCosmoBlog
MyMyDDBlogBlog
MyFutureMajorityBlog
MyFlickr
MyYouTube
MyFriendster
MyResume
Maggie Moon
MyFunny

NEWS
PREVIOUS POSTS
ARCHIVES
January 2001 / March 2003 / December 2003 / April 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / April 2006 / May 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / June 2008 / July 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / January 2009 / February 2009 / April 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / September 2012 /


e-mail

Websites for Democrats

Promoting Democracy One Pint at a Time

Protecting Urban Commons

Laugh

More Future

Spread the Blue

You're lucky you paid no money to see me

The Future

We train campaign staff

Music Helps

Lefty Theatre

Good Guy Lobbyists

The longview

Good Think Tank

Heroic

Framing Think Tank

Not a happy bunch

Good Guy Jobs

Terror Alert Level

Jesus vis a vis Jefferson

Steal what you like, but be nice

my del.icio.us

Few will have the greatness to bend history itself; but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total; of all those acts will be written the history of this generation. - R.F.K.